On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:11:17 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Of course, this will protect the calling task from getting oom-killed.
> > > > But it doesn't protect other tasks from getting oom-killed due to the
> > > > activity of _this_ task.
> > > >
> > > > But I think that problem already exists, and that this proposal doesn't
> > > > worsen anything, yes?
> > > >
> > > > Or is it the case that all other tasks are safely stuck in the freezer
> > > > at this time, so they won't be allocating any memory anyway?
> > >
> > > That is the idea, yes. ... but we now have more threads that are not
> > > freezable... so they may allocate the memory.
> > >
> > > Is it non-feasible to free memory without really going and allocating
> > > everything?
> >
> > The question is whether there is a point. In principle we can just go and
> > allocate as much as we need upfront. It shouldn't change anything, because
> > we resume and suspend devices after creating the image anyway.
> >
> > I think we could try to disable the OOM killer before suspend and just
> > allocate the memory for the image right before devices are suspended for the
> > first time.
> >
>
> It would be nice to do.
>
> shrink_all_memory() is simply trying to do something which page reclaim
> doesn't expect to do (free memory when there's already lots of memory
> free). Consequently it doesn't do it very well, and there's a good
> risk that changes to core reclaim will accidentally break
> shrink_all_memory().
OK, a patchset follows:
[1/3] - disable the OOM killer during system-wide power transitions (should be
done anyway IMO)
[2/3] - move swsusp_shrink_memory() to kernel/power/snapshot.c so that the
next patch is easier to read
[3/3] - drop shrink_all_memory()
Please have a look and tell me what you think.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
