Michael Trimarchi wrote:> Hi,>> Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:>> [snip]> >> Add suspend_block_timeout to block suspend for a limited time.>>>> Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> --->> +static DEFINE_TIMER(expire_timer, expire_suspend_blockers, 0, 0);>> +>> +static void update_suspend(struct suspend_blocker *blocker, long max_timeout)>> +{>> + if (max_timeout > 0) {>> + if (debug_mask & DEBUG_EXPIRE)>> + pr_info("suspend_blocker: %s, start expire timer, ">> + "%ld\n", blocker->name, max_timeout);>> + mod_timer(&expire_timer, jiffies + max_timeout);>> + } else {>> + if (del_timer(&expire_timer))>> + if (debug_mask & DEBUG_EXPIRE)>> + pr_info("suspend_blocker: %s, stop expire ">> + "timer\n", blocker->name);>> + if (max_timeout == 0)>> >> > So the max_timeout can be negative?>
update_sleep_wait_stats_locked(false);+ update_suspend(blocker, has_timeout ?+ max_suspend_blocker_timeout_locked() : -1); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list_lock, irqflags);
Ok sorry maybe in this call... I write to fast the email :(
>> +>> > Michael> _______________________________________________> linux-pm mailing list> linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
_______________________________________________linux-pm mailing listlinux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
