Hi, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > >> Ok, I understand, so how to know the devices dependences? There is a way >> to express >> this relation? Because if it is not possible a single flag can be used >> > > Nobody knows all the device dependencies. That's why we're afraid that > if you change the list, something will break. > > But this happen for broken device? The list is a sufficient condition for correct suspend phase but is not necesarry, because all the dependence are not registerd. But just to understand: What are the typical situation, because I suppose that we are not talking about broken device. >>> This will set the dont_suspend flag for all devices in the subtree >>> starting at topdev. >>> >>> >> Yes this is possible, but you walk all list twice. >> > > So what? Walking the list is very quick, and you're not on a > time-critical path. > > Yes, you are right, I will submit a new patch with all the necessary fixes > Alan Stern > > > Thanks _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
