Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
>
>> Drivers on embedded systems would be smart enough
>> to know that some of the devices should remain powered up, because
>> they could still be useful even when the CPU wasn't running.
>> The patch add the in_use attribute, that it can be used by the
>> the drivers to avoid power down during suspend.
>>
>
> OK, so the idea is that in_use will be set by the user space for devices that
> shouldn't be suspended. Is this correct?
>
> Assuming it is, I'd call the flag 'in_use' rather than 'is_inuse'. Also, if
> may_inuse is supposed to mean that we can set in_use for this device, I'd call
> it 'in_use_valid', I'd make it be unset by default and I'd allow the driver to
> unset it if it is going to react to 'in_use'.
>
is_inuse is set for the device. The may_inuse is automatically setting
for the child
device. This is done for automatically propagate the dependency
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Alan Stern" <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Pavel Mackek" <pavel@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Len Brown" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
>> index e73c92d..d67043b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
>> @@ -1124,6 +1124,49 @@ static struct device *next_device(struct klist_iter *i)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> + * device_visit_subtree - device subtree iterator.
>> + * @root: root struct device.
>> + * @data: data for the callback.
>> + * @fn: function to be called for each device.
>> + *
>> + * Iterate the @parent's subtree devices, and call @fn for each,
>> + * passing it @data.
>> + *
>> + */
>>
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure ig Greg is going to like it.
>
>
This function walk the tree of devices following the dependences in
iterative mode.
>> +void device_visit_subtree(struct device *root, void *data,
>> + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
>> +{
>> + struct klist_iter i;
>> + struct device *parent = root;
>>
>
> I'd call it 'current' or 'cur';
>
>
ok
>> + struct device *child = NULL;
>> + int error;
>> +
>> + klist_iter_init(&parent->p->klist_children, &i);
>> +move_down:
>> + error = fn(parent, data);
>> + if (error && parent != root)
>>
>
> Shouldn't the iteration break on error?
>
>
The iteration don't break on error because, the return just said that the
subtree is just enable
>> + goto move_up;
>> +
>> + pr_debug("device: '%s': %s\n", dev_name(parent), __func__);
>> +
>> + child = next_device(&i);
>> + if (child) {
>> + parent = child;
>> + goto move_down;
>> + }
>> +move_up:
>> + klist_iter_exit(&i);
>> + if (parent != root) {
>> + klist_iter_init_node(&parent->parent->p->klist_children, &i,
>> + &parent->p->knode_parent);
>> + parent = next_device(&i);
>> + if (parent)
>> + goto move_down;
>> + klist_iter_exit(&i);
>> + }
>>
>
> Please find a way to reduce the number of gotos in this function.
>
> Besides, I'm not sure if it's really necessary. What's wrong with using
> simply device_for_each_child() instead?
>
Just to have an iterative function
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> * device_for_each_child - device child iterator.
>> * @parent: parent struct device.
>> * @data: data for the callback.
>> @@ -1207,6 +1250,7 @@ int __init devices_init(void)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_visit_subtree);
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_for_each_child);
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_find_child);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> index 69b4ddb..00ad150 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> @@ -64,6 +64,45 @@ void device_pm_unlock(void)
>> mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>> }
>>
>> +int device_set_may_inuse_enable(struct device *dev, void *data)
>>
>
> What exactly is the purpose of this function?
>
>
This function said that the parent is used by a driver
>> +{
>> + pr_debug("PM: Device change in use status: %s\n", dev_name(dev));
>> +
>> + /* if the device is suspend the subtree is in may_suspend status */
>> + if (dev->power.is_inuse)
>> + goto out;
>>
>
> return 1; ?
>
>
>> +
>> + dev->power.may_inuse = (unsigned int)data;
>>
>
> Can this conversion be avoided?
>
>
>> + return 0;
>> +out:
>> + /* cut the entire subtree */
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * device_set_inuse_enable - Mark the device as used by userspace
>> + * application
>> + */
>> +int device_set_inuse_enable(struct device *dev, int enable)
>>
>
> We have bool for things like 'enable'.
>
>
ok
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>> +
>> + /* the new status is equal the old one */
>> + if (dev->power.is_inuse == enable)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + dev->power.is_inuse = enable;
>> +
>> + /* Update device children to set the in use status */
>> + device_visit_subtree(dev, (void *)enable,
>> + device_set_may_inuse_enable);
>>
>
> Why not do:
>
> if (dev->power.in_use != enable) {
> dev->power.in_use = enable;
> device_visit_subtree(dev, (void *)enable, device_set_may_inuse_enable);
> }
>
> Also, I think this 'enable' conversion isn't really necessary. You can use two
> separate helper functions for setting and unsetting and pass NULL as the second
> argument.
>
>
ok
>> +
>> +out:
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_set_inuse_enable);
>> +
>> /**
>> * device_pm_add - add a device to the list of active devices
>> * @dev: Device to be added to the list
>> @@ -78,6 +117,13 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev)
>> if (dev->parent->power.status >= DPM_SUSPENDING)
>> dev_warn(dev, "parent %s should not be sleeping\n",
>> dev_name(dev->parent));
>> + if (device_is_inuse(dev->parent)) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>> + /* if the parent has suspend disable, propagate it
>> + * to the new child */
>> + device_set_may_inuse_enable(dev, (void *)1);
>>
>
> The conversion is just terrible. I'd very much prefer it to be
> device_set_in_use_possible_enable(dev, true).
>
>
ok
>> + mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>> + }
>> } else if (transition_started) {
>> /*
>> * We refuse to register parentless devices while a PM
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/power.h b/drivers/base/power/power.h
>> index c7cb4fc..e7d21bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
>> @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ static inline void device_pm_init(struct device *dev)
>> dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int device_is_inuse(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return dev->power.is_inuse || dev->power.may_inuse;
>> +}
>>
>
> OK, so what's the meaning of is_inuse and may_inuse?
>
>
Maybe the idea is if the parent is in_use the child are may_inuse so
they are potentialy in
use. The user can disable a tree and after reanable a child.
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c b/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
>> index 596aeec..45d7f60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,34 @@
>> static const char enabled[] = "enabled";
>> static const char disabled[] = "disabled";
>>
>> +static ssize_t inuse_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", device_is_inuse(dev)
>> + ? enabled : disabled);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t
>> +inuse_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t n)
>> +{
>> + char *cp;
>> + int len = n;
>> +
>> + cp = memchr(buf, '\n', n);
>> + if (cp)
>> + len = cp - buf;
>> + if (len == sizeof enabled - 1
>> + && strncmp(buf, enabled, sizeof enabled - 1) == 0)
>> + device_set_inuse_enable(dev, 1);
>> + else if (len == sizeof disabled - 1
>> + && strncmp(buf, disabled, sizeof disabled - 1) == 0)
>> + device_set_inuse_enable(dev, 0);
>> + else
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + return n;
>> +}
>> +
>> static ssize_t
>> wake_show(struct device * dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char * buf)
>> {
>> @@ -76,10 +104,11 @@ wake_store(struct device * dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> }
>>
>> static DEVICE_ATTR(wakeup, 0644, wake_show, wake_store);
>> -
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(in_use, 0644, inuse_show, inuse_store);
>>
>> static struct attribute * power_attrs[] = {
>> &dev_attr_wakeup.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_in_use.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>> static struct attribute_group pm_attr_group = {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
>> index 2918c0e..84a2bab 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/device.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
>> @@ -496,6 +496,9 @@ extern struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, void *data,
>> extern int device_rename(struct device *dev, char *new_name);
>> extern int device_move(struct device *dev, struct device *new_parent,
>> enum dpm_order dpm_order);
>> +extern int device_set_inuse_enable(struct device *dev, int enable);
>> +extern void device_visit_subtree(struct device *root, void *data,
>> + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data));
>>
>> /*
>> * Root device objects for grouping under /sys/devices
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
>> index 1d4e2d2..85f3fb2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
>> @@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>> pm_message_t power_state;
>> unsigned can_wakeup:1;
>> unsigned should_wakeup:1;
>> + unsigned is_inuse:1;
>> + unsigned may_inuse:1;
>> +
>> enum dpm_state status; /* Owned by the PM core */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> struct list_head entry;
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
Michael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
