On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:02:58PM +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote: > * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-04-01 17:01:28]: > > This patch creates a new framework for identifying cpu-pinned timers > and hrtimers. > > > This framework is needed because pinned timers are expected to fire on > the same CPU on which they are queued. So it is essential to identify > these and not migrate them, in case there are any. How would that interact with add_timer_on()? You currently only support the current CPU, don't you? e.g. the new tip x86 machine check polling code relies on add_timer_on staying on that CPU. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
