On Sunday 22 March 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday 21 March 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > The story in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12846 shows > > that setting the power state of a PCI device by > > pci_raw_set_power_state() may sometimes fail. For this reason, > > pci_raw_set_power_state() should not assume that the power state of > > the device has actually changed after writing into its PMCSR. > > Instead, it should read the value from there and use it to update > > dev->current_state. It also is useful to print a warning if the > > device's power state hasn't changed as expected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > OK, since the Ben's radeonfb fix for bug #12846 has been merged, I'd like > to do something a bit different. > > Patch 1/2 introduces __pci_set_power_state() that will allow the radeonfb > driver not to open code PCI PM operations. > > Patch 2/2 makes the driver use __pci_set_power_state(). > > Comments welcome. Well, Jesse doesn't like these patches very much, so here's an alternative. 1/2 changes platform_pci_set_power_state() into an exported function (and uses it to simplify pci_set_power_state() a bit) so that the radeonfb driver can use it. 2/2 modifies the radeonfb driver itself. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
