Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] PCI PM: Introduce __pci_set_power_state()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 23 March 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.

Hi,

> It's not an error if we fail to set the desired state? (I see you have a
> dev_warn only).

Theoretically, it is, but since we've never returned errors in such cases,
we'd probably see some unexpected suspend failures if we started to do that
now.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux