On Friday 20 March 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > And, quite frankly, I'm not sure if users will be happy with > > > the $subject patch, because it _really_ breaks things (well, > > > the kexec users who don't use suspend might be, but surely > > > suspend users who don't use kexec won't). > > > > Please note that i havent reviewed the patches and i did not > > take any sides in the discussion - i just flagged the maintainer > > ping-pong. As long as we pick one of the patches (or a third > > one) within a bound amount of time we should be fine :) > > I'll defer to Rafael here; he's been working the most in this area. > The changelog wasn't very complete for the original patch, but it > sounds like in the kexec case the newly booted kernel will get an igb > device in D3 which it can't handle? That really does sound like a > driver bug, not something we should mess with in the core. I have already posted an alternative patch for igb that's been reported to fix the problem. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
