Re: [v3 PATCH 2/4] timers: Identifying the existing pinned timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-16 16:40:45]:
> 
> The following pinned hrtimers have been identified and marked:
> 1)sched_rt_period_timer
> 2)tick_sched_timer
> 3)stack_trace_timer_fn

How did you verify that these are the only timers which need to be
pinned ?

Can we be sure that there is no code which relies on the current
behaviour to keep functionality tied together ? Networking and block
layer comes to mind.

Thanks,

	tglx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux