Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 13 March 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > +void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool suspend)
> > +{
> > +       if (suspend) {
> > +               if (desc->action && (desc->action->flags & IRQF_TIMER))
> > +                       return;
> 
> Don't you want "(!desc->action || ..." here to avoid enabling unused
> interrupts on resume?

Hmm, good idea, thanks.

Best,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux