On Sunday 08 March 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 08 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 08 March 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > > > > > Impact: second kernel by kexec will have some pci devices working > > > > > > > > Found one system with 82575EB, in the kernel that is kexeced, probe igb > > > > failed with -2. > > > > > > > > it looks like the same behavior happened on forcedeth. > > > > try to check system_state to make sure if put it on D3 > > > > > > This is not enough, because the PM code doesn't change > > > system_state and it uses pci_set_power_state too. > > > > > > > Jesse Brandeburg said that we should do that check in core > > > > code instead of every device driver. > > > > > > Well, I'm not really sure. The drivers are where the bug is. > > > > So Yinghai has now written a driver fix and a generic code fix > > as well and both are being rejected pointing to the other side? > > > > This really sucks for users (who'd be happy with any of the > > patches) and the disagreement needs to be resolved ASAP. > > I hope you read my other comment (that you deleted from the reply)? > > If we're going to fix this at the core level along the Yinghai's patch lines, > we'll have to introduce a few additional values for system_state and make > suspend and hibernation code use them. > > Do you think it's worth the effort, given that only a couple of drivers have > been found to be affected so far? And, quite frankly, I'm not sure if users will be happy with the $subject patch, because it _really_ breaks things (well, the kexec users who don't use suspend might be, but surely suspend users who don't use kexec won't). Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
