On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Cornelia Huck wrote: > dpm_list currently relies on the fact that child devices will > be registered after their parents to get a correct suspend > order. Using device_move() however destroys this assumption, as > an already registered device may be moved under a newly registered > one. > > This patch adds a new argument to device_move(), allowing callers > to specify how dpm_list should be adapted. I like this version much better. device_move() is now a little more complicated, but the callers are considerably simpler. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
