On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > > What you're missing is that the embedded world is quite a large one. I'm gpoing to give you one more clue, and if you don't stop sending out these IDIOTIC emails, I'm going to put you into my killfile. Got it? So listen up: - the number of ARM chips sold doesn't matter one F*CKING WHIT. - You need to add ONE SINGLE "sysdev" entry for ARM to take care of this FOR EVERY DAMN SINGLE ONE. - Your inane whining about this AFTER I HAVE TOLD YOU MULTIPLE TIMES HOW TO DO IT, AND AFTER I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT IT'S A SPECIAL CASE, IS F*CKING IRRITATING. Got it? I _grepped_ for that enable_irq_wake() use. It looks like it's only used on ARM and maybe BF. Add the five lines of code (just cut and paste them from my earlier email) to your architecture already, AND STOP WHINING. It's not a generic case. It's not a problem. You can damn well fix it in the ONE SINGLE ARCHITECTURE (or maybe two) that cares. I've told you how. Why is it so damn hard for you to just accept? Linus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
