Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Yes - but that kind of policy should be coupled and expressed 
> via cpusets. /proc based irq_affinity is just a limited, 
> inflexible hack. All things IRQ partitioning should be handled 
> via cpusets - perhaps via the 'system sets' idea from Peter?

all we got out of that idea was the default_smp_affinity thing
in /proc/irq and a head-ache trying to work out silly details.

Maybe we ought to try again,..

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux