On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> We only have one gpio input driver, but I don't think is good to loose >> any wakeup interrupts. Any driver that needs an edge triggered wakeup >> interrupt will have problems if the hardware does not regenerate the >> interrupt when the host does not respond. > > We are not loosing interrupts. The normal implementation of disable > is a software disable and sets IRQ_PENDING to ensure we don't loose > interrupts when the interrupt is disabled. We loose the wakeup, but yes, the interrupt will be delivered if the system wakes up for any other reason. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm