Hi! > > > The recent descussion about the Android PM patches sent by Arve shows that > > > there is a need to introduce a mechanism allowing us to: > > > (1) automatically put the system as a whole into a sleep state (eg. suspend to > > > RAM) when it is found to be "idle", where the meaning of "idle" has to be > > > defined too, > > > > Well; I'd prefer to keep the interface very minimal. > > > > If no devices are being used, > > We'll need some kind of infrastructure to detect such situations. Yes, I like the latest 'atomic_t + bit in struct device' ideas... > > and next wakeup is far enough in the future, > > What exactly do you mean by "next wakeup"? Next timer in kernel and next sleep/select timeout in userspace. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
