On Saturday 21 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:40:48AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > We can't do the quirks from the kernel and that's one of the reasons why I > > think user space should start automatic suspend (it can do the quirks if > > necessary). > > Any sort of automatic suspend is simply impossible in a world where your > drivers don't work properly. There's code for making intel and radeon > handle suspend/resume themselves now, and nvidia before g80 should also > be easy. More recent nvidia is going to be some work. > > But yeah. Let's not have "Work around broken drivers" as a design goal. OK, I'm withdrawing it, then. :-) > The argument against timeouts in wakelocks works just as well here. So, what do you thing about the approach desribed earlier in this thread (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/20/182)? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
