On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:22:15PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2009-02-16 23:23:30, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > This, again, seems to be a bit x86-centric. :-) The Android people are telling > > > us that on the hardware they deal with it does make sense to put the entire > > > system to sleep even for relatively short periods of time, since the latencies > > > involved are not too bad. > > > > Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but > > ...for Arve's hardware. Not all embedded systems are like that, and > OLPC / PCs are definitely not like that. And PCs have enough latency over suspend/resume that we can't do it automatically in a non-intrusive manner anyway, so runtime pm is more interesting there as well. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
