Am Wednesday 18 February 2009 00:26:53 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > Another possibility is to set up independent runtime PM for the > > transport and the device. This means allowing the possibility that the > > transport is suspended while its child (the device) is not. This is a > > little simpler (there's only one idle-timeout per device, since the > > link is treated as an independent device), but it violates the > > principle of never suspending a parent while there is an active child. > > Well, I think the first approach would be better. I am afraid it wouldn't be. How do you deal with shared transports? Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
