Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:22:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2009-02-16 23:13:24, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, on embedded it's becoming a less interesting problem because 
> > > idle and suspended are often now equivalent states. 
> > 
> > Android people tell us otherwise.
> 
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2009-January/019493.html 
> says that they're the same on their current platform.

Well on the Qualcomm MSM72xx SoCs, yeah they're pretty similar -- we can
reasonably enter power collapse (full shutdown of the ARM11 and
peripherals) from idle.  But this is not (to my knowledge) true of *all*
SoCs out there.  Also, resuming from this state can take 5-30ms
(depending on how distracted the baseband processor is by what's going
on on the network).

Brian
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux