On 02/11/2009 09:51 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/11/2009 01:36 AM, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-02-10-16-35 has been uploaded
>
> Hi,
>
> I've found out, that S4 disappeared in this release, in comparison to mmotm
> based on 2.6.29-rc2:
> -ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S5)
> +ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S5)
>
> Any ideas what could have caused this?
I think this one
ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=n
because
SMP=y
since
config ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE
def_bool y
- depends on !SMP || !X86_VOYAGER
+ depends on !SMP
The condition was wrong, ok, anyway it worked. Would
depends on !SMP || EXPERIMENTAL
make sense? The smp is handled in disable_nonboot_cpus manner, right?
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
