On Thu 2009-02-05 19:42:13, Arve Hj?nnev?g wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > ...so I guess I'll wait for extended description. > PM: wakelock: Abort task freezing if a wakelock is locked. > > If a wakelock is locked, suspend will fail anyway. Since try_to_freeze_tasks > can take up to 20 seconds to complete or fail, aborting as soon as someone > locks a wakelock (e.g. from an interrupt handler) improves the worst case > wakeup latency. Well, I'd rather fix the cases when freeze() takes too long. If that is infeasible, yes, I guess we can do this. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
