> Well I'm glad you listened to me when I told you not to fire off a rant > email before I had another look at it ;) > > Because Arjan has patched the generic bug.h so that we at least get the > printk on powerpc, and then use our version of __WARN(). Right. A deep breath later or two ... the current upstream code in pci-driver.c doesn't have a message, which is why I didn't see it. The -new- code from Rafael does, and it would work thanks to Arjan fix. Now I should indeed stop listening to you telling me it's broken before I get a chance to verify it :-) > As far as the code gen, with gcc 4.3.1 (debian). .../... > So it's jumping over the if body, rather than moving it out of the > straight line. It is hinting it right, so we should check if that helps > us at all. Right, gcc is full of sh*t as usual. Now try replacing the magic trap which we still use in there, with a normal C function call (ie branch out of line), see if it makes a difference. The trap statement uses an inline asm statement and I know for a fact that the mere existence of such a thing will make gcc already dubious idea of whether to go out of line or not completely bonkers. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
