On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > This patch looks broken to me, at least for some of your changes. > > For example, in the bit quoted above all printks together make up > > *one single* message, which means that only the _first_ of the > > printks should have the KERN_* prefix. printks that are continuations > > should not have the prefix. > > Actually they should, but the right prefix :-) Hmm. I was going by memory and from what I've seen in existing code, but also found this (somewhat old) post: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/kernel-janitors/2005-October/014375.html > Quoting include/linux/kernel.h: > | /* > | * Annotation for a "continued" line of log printout (only done after a > | * line that had no enclosing \n). Only to be used by core/arch code > | * during early bootup (a continued line is not SMP-safe otherwise). > | */ > | #define KERN_CONT "" > > Please also consider the note about SMP-safeness. >From that it looks like KERN_CONT should only be used in a very limited context, but I guess this example qualifies. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
