Frans Pop wrote: > This patch looks broken to me, at least for some of your changes. > For example, in the bit quoted above all printks together make up > *one single* message, which means that only the _first_ of the > printks should have the KERN_* prefix. printks that are continuations > should not have the prefix. Are you absolutely sure about that? The janitors todo lets me guess they should aswell me prefixed. Otherwise yes, then some of the changes wouldn't be needed. Thanks, Frank _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
