> > The problem is that he's talking about making changes to a kernel that > > will be installed in all sorts of machines, from phones all the way up > > to supercomputers. When you do this, you have to broaden your point of > > view -- your code has to run correctly in all of these settings. > > > Well, it should not interfere with any of these settings. And I think it is > understood by now that we has to take back the semantic change of "echo mem > > /sys/power/state" > > On the other hand, I think it is quite reasonable to have aditional suspend > mechanisms on a phone then you have on a super computer. Obviously you don't > want the supercomputer to suspend everytime nobody is watching :-) Actually you'd like your supercomputer to turn on wake-on-lan then sleep when noone is watching (and there are no pending jobs). 'green datacenter' is popular buzzword ;-). -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
