On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, goal is that compiling in wakelock / early suspend support has > no effect on existing functionality. OK. I think I'll just print a warning and disable wakelock support if user-space writes to /sys/power/state when wakelock support is compiled in. A wakelock aware power manager in user-space can use an always non-blocking interface (e.g. /sys/power/request_state) instead. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
