On Sunday 01 February 2009, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > If the user forcibly puts the device into suspend, it's very much like powering > > off. The kernel shouldn't prevent that from happening unless in error > > conditions. > > No, when the phone is powered off, it is not expected to ring. When it > is suspended it is expected to ring. > > > If incoming calls are supposed to wake up the system, then there are two > > possibilities: > > - the already started suspend sequence may be aborted and the system may be put > > into the low power state, > > I assume you mean high power state not low power state, or does low > power state mean early-suspend state. If so, locking a wakelock will > accomplish this. Actually, I meant the working state. Aborting suspend sequence always means go back to the working state. Also, I think the device that detected the incoming call should abort the suspend sequence by refusing to suspend. > > - the system may be suspended and then immediately woken up. > > If you mean this as a general strategy, and not a specific outcome, > then it does not always work (for the reasons I have already stated). I meant a specific outcome. It may be impossible to abort suspend if the call comes in sufficiently late. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
