On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just one comment here - you're adding new procfs entries. IIRC, sysfs is > strongly preferred now. I'm adding one procfs entry for stats/debugging information. The sysfs rules do not allow this type of data so procfs seemed like the best fit. -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
