> As usual, git is actually smarter and get things more correct than people > realize. What you found "surprising" is actually a "profound truth". > > Git is like a great indian mystic. It sees past the veil of the trivial, > to find the true connections in life. > > Or at least in source code. Thanks for confirming that the unexpected diff is a fature of git rather than a bug. Since I had used "git mv", I had expected everything to show up as a move. However, I understand that comparing file contents over that move and other code moves told a different 'big picture' story. I guess using 'git mv' gave me the false expectation that git actually tracks moves like other SCMs and it would show up that way in the diff -- though now that I think about it, I like the comparison of the two endpoints that git did even better. I guess you can make an argument either way about how to handle moves. One problem that both have to deal with is that a history on the old (now missing) file location doesn't work, and that by default the history on the new location stops unless log --follow is used. gitk doesn't use --follow by default, and when it is added, the history looks pretty strange. thanks, -Len Brown Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
