Re: [Regression] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 08 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 January 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >> Am Thursday 08 January 2009 17:36:12 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> >> You are making a very persuasive argument for reverting it.
> >> But what about laptops that only have a USB keyboard?
> > 
> > Well, up to and including 2.6.28 they needed to echo 'enable' to the USB
> > controllers' /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup files, so if the patch is
> > reverted, they won't be worse off than they were day before
> > yesterday. :-) 
> > 
> > Perhaps we can choose the default depending on whether or not any HID
> > devices are attached to given controller?
> 
> Is "resume on keyboard activity" really all that needed? Both my laptops 
> and my desktop resume fine after pressing the power button.
> 
> Also consider the following cases:
> - laptop has been suspended with external USB mouse connected
>   - mouse is moved (accidentally or because it is in the way of a coffee
>     cup)
>   - mouse cable is removed before putting the laptop in a bag for
>     transport
> - laptop is in docking station with USB mouse/kbd connected to that
>   - again, mouse gets moved for some reason
>   - laptop is undocked while suspended
>   - or the reverse: laptop gets docked

One more case (a real-life example actually):
- There is a USB wireless mouse attached to the box while suspending and the
  mouse is powered off by pressing a button on it.  The mouse's radio receiver
  remains in a USB port on the box.  Now, if the mouse is powered off again,
  the box will resume.  What if that happens accidentally while the box is
  being carried in a backpack?

> IMO it is not desirable that the system gets resumed as a result of any of 
> those actions. I'm not complete sure that it would in all those cases, 
> but have they been considered?
> 
> And in general I've always been in favor of things only happening 
> automagically if I've explicitly asked for that, and not by default.

I have to say I agree.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux