Hi!
> PCI devices without drivers are not disabled during suspend and
> hibernation, but they are enabled during resume, with the help of
> pci_reenable_device(), so there is an unbalanced execution of
> pcibios_enable_device() in the resume code path.
>
> To correct this introduce function pci_disable_enabled_device()
> that will disable the argument device, if it is enabled when the
> function is being run, without updating the device's pci_dev
> structure and use it in the suspend code path to balance the
> pci_reenable_device() executed during resume.
> +/**
> + * pci_disable_enabled_device - Disable device without updating enable_cnt
> + * @dev: PCI device to disable
> + *
> + * NOTE: This function is a backend of PCI power management routines and is
> + * not supposed to be called drivers.
"by drivers"?
> @@ -441,7 +455,10 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device
> }
> } else if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev)) {
> error = pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + } else {
> + pci_default_pm_suspend_early(pci_dev);
> }
> +
> pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_suspend, pci_dev);
>
> return error;
So tre fixup runs on the disabled device?
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <Pavel@xxxxxxx>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
