On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 10:00:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > So, to fix the issue at hand, I'd like the $subject patch to go first. Then, > > there is a major update of the new framework waiting for .29 in the Greg's > > tree (that's the main reason why nobody uses it so far, BTW) and I'd really > > prefer it to go next. After it's been merged, I'm going to add the mandatory > > suspend-resume things (save state and go to a low power state on suspend, > > restore state on resume) to the new framework in a separete patch. > > > > Is this plan acceptable? > > Sounds good to me. And assuming Jesse/Greg are all aboard, I'll just wait > for the pull requests from Jesse and Greg. No objection from me, I'll wait for Jesse to "go first" in the .29 merge window. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
