Hi. On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 00:48 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:11 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The current design of the freezer is rather simplistic and I'm not really sure > > > it's the best one possible. Perhaps we can redesign the freezer to work > > > differently and handle the cases like fuse. > > > > Why redo what I've already done? In the full patch, you have the basis > > of what you're talking about. I haven't seen a failure to freeze fuse or > > anything else in a year of use. > > Well yeah, your patch handles the straightforward cases. But it > doesn't help with the more tricky cases, where one fuse filesystem is > using another, and as those may become more widespread, this approach > will fail. At the moment, yes. But it's not impossible for us to modify the patch to handle that as well. Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
