On Wednesday, 29 of October 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:11 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The current design of the freezer is rather simplistic and I'm not really sure > > it's the best one possible. Perhaps we can redesign the freezer to work > > differently and handle the cases like fuse. > > Why redo what I've already done? In the full patch, you have the basis > of what you're talking about. I haven't seen a failure to freeze fuse or > anything else in a year of use. Still, Miklos noticed some problems with it. I'm not talking about doing things on top of the current signal-based freezing mechanism, but rather about moving the freezer a bit closer towards the scheduler. Maybe this is the way to go. I don't know. In any case, the freezing of user space seems to be much simpler than modifying all drivers to add suspend synchronization. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
