Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI hibernate: Add a mechanism to save/restore ACPI NVS memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> ACPI hibernate: Add a mechanism to save/restore ACPI NVS memory
> 
> According to the ACPI Specification 3.0b, Section 15.3.2,
> "OSPM will call the _PTS control method some time before entering a
> sleeping state, to allow the platform???s AML code to update this
> memory image before entering the sleeping state. After the system
> awakes from an S4 state, OSPM will restore this memory area and call
> the _WAK control method to enable the BIOS to reclaim its memory
> image."  For this reason, implement a mechanism allowing us to save
> the NVS memory during hibernation and to restore it during the
> subsequent resume.
> 
> Based on a patch by Zhang Rui.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/suspend.h   |   13 ++++
>  kernel/power/swsusp.c     |  121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 


> @@ -387,8 +410,21 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_begin_old(vo
>  {
>  	int error = acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4);
>  
> +	if (!error) {
> +		error = hibernate_nvs_alloc();
> +		if (!error)
> +			acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S4;
> +	}
> +	return error;
> +}

You can chain this without nesting...

If sleep_prepare() succeeds but nvs_alloc() fails, you should undo
sleep_prepare here, right?


>  #else /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
>  static inline int swsusp_page_is_forbidden(struct page *p) { return 0; }
>  static inline void swsusp_set_page_free(struct page *p) {}
> @@ -241,6 +246,14 @@ static inline void swsusp_unset_page_fre
>  static inline void hibernation_set_ops(struct platform_hibernation_ops *ops) {}
>  static inline int hibernate(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>  static inline bool system_entering_hibernation(void) { return false; }
> +static inline int hibernate_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int hibernate_nvs_alloc(void) { return 0; }
> +static inline void hibernate_nvs_free(void) {}
> +static inline void hibernate_nvs_save(void) {}
> +static inline void hibernate_nvs_restore(void) {}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */

Can someone call these for !hibernation case? Should they fake success
if they do call them?


> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> @@ -262,3 +262,124 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Platforms, like ACPI, may want us to save some memory used by them during
> + * hibernation and to restore the contents of this memory during the subsequent
> + * resume.  The code below implements a mechanism allowing us to do that.
> + */
> +
> +struct nvs_page {
> +	unsigned long phys_start;
> +	unsigned int size;
> +	void *kaddr;
> +	void *data;
> +	struct list_head node;
> +};

Maybe separate nvs.c file would be good? I believe this _is_ acpi
specific, altrough in theory it may not be.
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux