applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:67: warning: ‘acpi_pm_disable_gpes’ defined but not used
> >
> > > >
> > > > Shows that this code has an identity crisis due to a maze of #ifdefs, in
> > > > the PM_SLEEP && !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATION case for example.
> > >
> > > This case is invalid, because PM_SLEEP == SUSPEND || HIBERNATION !
> >
> > I though so too, but 2.6.27 appears to have added XEN to the mix:
> >
> > config PM_SLEEP
> > bool
> > depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION || XEN_SAVE_RESTORE
>
> Yeah, which breaks things. :-(
>
> The patch below should fix it and BTW I think ACPI_SLEEP should not depend
> on XEN_SAVE_RESTORE anyway, so this is a bug fix really (please consider as
> .28 material, probably -stable too).
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>
> ACPI suspend: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependence and some compilation warnings
>
> Initially CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined as
> CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION and some ACPI code, most
> importantly the code in drivers/acpi/main.c, was written with this
> assumption. Currently, however, CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is also set when
> CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE is set.
>
> This causes some compilation warnings to appear in
> drivers/acpi/main.c if both CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> are unset and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set (this was impossible before).
> To fix this problem, redefine CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP do depend directly
> on CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION, as originally intended, and
> use it instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/main.c, wherever
> appropriate.
>
> Additionally, move the acpi_target_sleep_state definition from under
> the #ifdef to prevent compilation from failing in some cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ if ACPI
>
> config ACPI_SLEEP
> bool
> - depends on PM_SLEEP
> + depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION
> default y
>
> config ACPI_PROCFS
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include "sleep.h"
>
> u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> +static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
>
> static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_state)
> {
> @@ -45,9 +46,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> -static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> /*
> * ACPI 1.0 wants us to execute _PTS before suspending devices, so we allow the
> * user to request that behavior by using the 'acpi_old_suspend_ordering'
> @@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ static void acpi_pm_end(void)
> */
> acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> extern void do_suspend_lowlevel(void);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
