On Thursday, 11 of September 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Introduce .wakeup_event(). When a device gets a wakeup event,
> the callback is called. The callback usually should disable wakeup event.
>
> ---
> include/linux/pm.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/include/linux/pm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/pm.h 2008-09-11 10:56:27.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/include/linux/pm.h 2008-09-11 10:56:29.000000000 +0800
> @@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ typedef struct pm_message {
> * make ANY assumptions about the hardware state right prior to @restore().
> * On most platforms, there are no restrictions on availability of
> * resources like clocks during @restore().
> + * @wakeup_event: Checks if a wakeup event occurs. In bus level, the op might
> + * check all devices under the bus and call device_receive_wakeup_event()
> + * for devices which invoke wakeup event. In device level, the op just
> + * returns if a wakeup event occurs. Note, if device follows standard
> + * mechanism for wakeup which bus level can handle, device level op can be
> + * empty.
> *
> * All of the above callbacks, except for @complete(), return error codes.
> * However, the error codes returned by the resume operations, @resume(),
> @@ -151,6 +157,7 @@ struct pm_ops {
> int (*thaw)(struct device *dev);
> int (*poweroff)(struct device *dev);
> int (*restore)(struct device *dev);
> + bool (*wakeup_event)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
> /**
I think it will be better to place wakeup_event() in 'struct device' itself
rather than here.
Generally, the 'struct pm_ops' thing (after the simplification patch queued up
for .29 that will be 'struct dev_pm_ops') will depend on PM_SLEEP and
wakeup_event() is a run-time thing.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
