Re: ACPI: Make /proc/acpi/wakeup interface handle PCI devices (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, 3 of October 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:21:47 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Len,
> > 
> > I think we should do this in .27.
> 
> Is Len not there?  Can some other acpi person please review this for
> 2.6.27 inclusion?
> 
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > ACPI: Make /proc/acpi/wakeup interface handle PCI devices (again)
> > 
> > Make the ACPI /proc/acpi/wakeup interface set the appropriate
> > wake-up bits of physical devices corresponding to the ACPI
> > devices and make those bits be set initially for devices that are
> > enabled to wake up by default.  This is needed to restore the
> > previous behavior for the PCI devices that were previously handled
> > correctly with the help of the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface.
> 
> hm, if you say so.  It's a bit hard to judge the impact of not fixing this?

There are people for whom /proc/acpi/wakeup worked, but since Tino Keitel
was the only person reporting this problem, I think it's not widespread.

> When is "previous"?  Was 2.6.26 similarly busted?

Well, "previous" means "as in 2.6.26 and earlier", so this is a recent
regression.

/proc/acpi/ is going to go away at one point, but I think we shouldn't break 
working setups given that the fix is not very intrusive.

> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/glue.c       |    5 ++++-
> >  drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c
> > @@ -377,6 +377,14 @@ acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show(struc
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void physical_device_enable_wakeup(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = acpi_get_physical_device(adev->handle);
> > +
> > +	if (dev && device_can_wakeup(dev))
> > +		device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, adev->wakeup.state.enabled);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static ssize_t
> >  acpi_system_write_wakeup_device(struct file *file,
> >  				const char __user * buffer,
> > @@ -411,6 +419,7 @@ acpi_system_write_wakeup_device(struct f
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	if (found_dev) {
> > +		physical_device_enable_wakeup(found_dev);
> >  		list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> >  			struct acpi_device *dev = container_of(node,
> >  							       struct
> > @@ -428,6 +437,7 @@ acpi_system_write_wakeup_device(struct f
> >  				       dev->pnp.bus_id, found_dev->pnp.bus_id);
> >  				dev->wakeup.state.enabled =
> >  				    found_dev->wakeup.state.enabled;
> > +				physical_device_enable_wakeup(dev);
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> > @@ -165,8 +165,11 @@ static int acpi_bind_one(struct device *
> >  				"firmware_node");
> >  		ret = sysfs_create_link(&acpi_dev->dev.kobj, &dev->kobj,
> >  				"physical_node");
> > -		if (acpi_dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
> > +		if (acpi_dev->wakeup.flags.valid) {
> >  			device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> > +			device_set_wakeup_enable(dev,
> > +						acpi_dev->wakeup.state.enabled);
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux