On Tue 2008-08-26 13:01:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag 26 August 2008 11:43:55 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > > firstly, it doesn't consider error handling before suspending. > > > > What problems do you see with error handling? This patch does not > > touch the error handling, and I do not think it needs to touch it. > > You'd make scsi driver writers' life easier if you made sure no autosuspends > happen while they recover from errors. After all, you have no idea which > commands will get through while the bus is in disarray. Well, they have to handle other commands while bus has problems, anyway, right? So I'm not creating any _new_ problems for them. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
