On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:39:13AM +0200, ext Oliver Neukum wrote:
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbhid.h 2008-05-06 13:49:51.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbhid.h 2008-05-06 14:58:49.000000000 +0200
> @@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ int usbhid_wait_io(struct hid_device* hi
> void usbhid_close(struct hid_device *hid);
> int usbhid_open(struct hid_device *hid);
> void usbhid_init_reports(struct hid_device *hid);
> -void usbhid_submit_report(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report, unsigned char dir);
> +void usbhid_submit_report
> +(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_report *report, unsigned char dir);
void usbhid_submit_report(struct hid_device *hid,
struct hid_report *report, unsigned char dir);
would look better. Matter of taste. ditto below.
> switch (urb->status) {
> case 0: /* success */
> + usbhid_mark_busy(usbhid);
^^^^^^^
you added whitespaces there
--
balbi
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
