Re: [rft]autosuspend for btusb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag 22 August 2008 16:31:10 schrieb Marcel Holtmann:

Hi,

> > > Please explain the tx_in_flight stuff to me. It looks unneeded since we
> > > anchor all TX URBs anyway.
> > 
> > The completion of an URB may happen after the autosuspend timeout passed.
> > But we cannot use the pm counters as they are not accessible in interrupt.
> > Hence we must maintain a counter ourselves.
> 
> Can we not just check the number of URBs in the anchor? I am against
> just duplicating a counter, but then lets call it it what it is to make
> it gets not misused. It is a purely a PM counter.

Yes, we can do that. In fact a bool empty/!empty will do. I'll do that.

	Regards
		Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux