On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Would it make sense to split the patches into "autosuspend for SCSI > devices" and "autosuspend for SCSI controllers" for easier > review/merge? I guess I'll start with the devices, they seem easier... It really should be split up differently. The topics of interest are: idle detection for SCSI devices, autosuspend for SCSI targets and its relation to suspend for SCSI devices, passing suspend & resume notifications to the transport class, adding a USB transport class so that usb-storage can respond to those notifications, modifying other transport classes as needed so that the LLDs can power-down links or host adapters. I think that covers it. Oliver may have some additional suggestions. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
