Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:40:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Few days ago I discovered that resume from suspend to ram does not work anymore >>>> on my 2.6.27-rc2 (actually 796aadeb1b2db9b5d463946766c5bbfd7717158c) gentoo box. >>>> My computer just boots on resume. Today I had enough time to bisect it and found >>>> (after 1 panic and 1 build breakage) out "the reason": >>>> >>>> $ git bisect good >>>> d05cdb25d80f06f77aa6bddb53cd1390d4d91a0b is first bad commit >>>> commit d05cdb25d80f06f77aa6bddb53cd1390d4d91a0b >>>> Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Date: Mon May 12 21:20:54 2008 +0200 >>>> >>>> ftrace: fix dynamic ftrace selftest >>>> >>> Does it still happen if: >>> - CONFIG_FTRACE is unset >>> >> no >> >> >>> - CONFIG_FTRACE is set, but CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST is unset? >>> >> yes >> > > Thanks for testing. > > Well, ftrace is a new feature in 2.6.27, IIRC, so this is not a regression in > the strict sense. > > Still, of couse, there is a bug in ftrace that needs to be fixed. Steven? > Sorry for the late response. Red Hat changed its mail servers, and my mail was in limbo for a while. I'm not doubting that FTRACE enabled breaks suspend to ram, but I find it highly unlikely that the commit you posted was the culprit. Especially since it still breaks when STARTUP_TEST is disabled. That change was a STARTUP_TEST change only. Perhaps it just moved things around enough to cause your issues. But you say that if you take Linus's latest git tree, and revert only this change, it works?? Hmm, this is very strange. -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
