On Monday, 4 of August 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Rafael, any objections? > > > > Hm, well, one thing below. > > > device_pm_add() can now be void and the error variable in there is not > > necessary any more. > > Do you think we will want to make device_pm_add() return an error at > some point in the future? Well, maybe, but not any time soon. :-) > For example, earlier you had it fail if the parent device was asleep, instead > of just printing a warning. Yes, I remeber it, but there still are some drivers that would break if we did that. Anyway, I think it won't be hard to change device_pm_add() to return error codes again if we decide to in future. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
