On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:49:46 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > } > > if (status < 0) > > printk(err_suspend, status); > > + > > + /* Some platforms can't detect that the alarm triggered the > > + * wakeup, or (accordingly) disable it after it afterwards. > > + * It's supposed to give oneshot behavior; cope. > > + */ > > + alm.enabled = false; > > + rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alm); > > } > > > > static int __init has_wakealarm(struct device *dev, void *name_ptr) > > I assume this fixes some reported bug? Any references? > > Is this needed in 2.6.26.x? 2.6.25.x? oh. pm-selftest is new. Ignore me. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
