On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:07 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> One is to try and disallow users from moving frozen tasks. That doesn't > >> seem like a good approach since it would require a new cgroups interface > >> "can_detach()". > > > > Detaching from the old cgroup happens at the same time as attaching to > > the new cgroup, so can_attach() would work here. Update: I've made a patch implementing this. However it might be better to just modify attach() to thaw the moving task rather than disallow moving the frozen task. Serge, Cedric, Kame-san, do you have any thoughts on which is more useful and/or intuitive? > And the whole can_attach()/attach() protocol needs reworking anyway, > see my email (hopefully) later today. > > Paul Interesting. I look forward to seeing this. Cheers, -Matt _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
