* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
>
> If this could be sneaked into Ingo's tree for some automated testing,
> that would be good.
sure - i have applied it to tip/out-of-tree. I'm equally nervous about
this change - it affects every suspend+resume cycle that people do on
those boxes which are working just fine currently.
btw., it would get a lot more coverage on my test-systems if this commit
in tip/out-of-tree:
| commit 01259383c345d13b70efcc549439927ae64dc66d
| Author: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| Date: Fri May 16 10:12:36 2008 +0200
|
| sleepy linux self-test
was upstream and if it was enabled more prominently, instead of hidden
behind the rather obscure condition of:
config PM_TEST_SUSPEND
bool "Test suspend/resume and wakealarm during bootup"
depends on SUSPEND && PM_DEBUG && RTC_LIB=y
and even then it needs certain other config options related to RTC_LIB
to actually work during bootup.
As a result of all this obstruction, the automated testing i do, which
builds and boots more than 1 random kernel per minute, will only run
this self-test once every hour or so.
I dont mind if this option breaks boxes (that its purpose: it does the
same thing that a real suspend+resume does and suspend+resume frequently
breaks boxes), but right now it's all obscured so heavily which makes
automated testing a lot harder than it should be.
it would be wonderful if this excellent suspend+resume self-test was
upstream and was more prominent! :-)
Ingo
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
