Re: [PATCH] add a printk_init variant storing format strings in __initdata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [As gcc seems unable to help us out selecting the appropriate data segment
> for the code, how about we did something like this?]
>
> When using printk from __init functions it would be desirable to place
> the printk format strings in __initdata.  Add a printk_init() variant
> which does this.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/4/185

I don't know if `desirable' is the technical argument Sam wants to hear :)

	Hannes
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux