On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:20:11 -0400 Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Linus, > > please pull from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release > > This batch is a proper super-set of the pull request I made a week ago. > It will update the files shown below. > I have four acpi-related reports here from 2.6.25-rcX-mmY. Can you please check that they were addressed? I don't recall seeing any feedback for any of them. Thanks. From: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx Subject: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 -- initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:17 -0400 Is this indicative of a kernel or hardware problem? [ 0.279606] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing [ 0.279789] initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance [ 0.330789] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) From: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Len Brown" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:55 +0800 Hi, I got the following lockdep warning: (add linux-acpi to cc) [ 0.097109] ACPI: Core revision 20070126 [ 0.097282] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [ 0.097355] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [ 0.097428] turning off the locking correctness validator. [ 0.097503] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 #3 [ 0.097578] [<c0127bf8>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 [ 0.097716] [<c014b01c>] __lock_acquire+0x40c/0x760 [ 0.097822] [<c0181ba0>] ? alloc_debug_processing+0xb0/0x140 [ 0.097959] [<c014b969>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 0.098063] [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40 [ 0.098197] [<c03df9e8>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0xa0 [ 0.098303] [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40 [ 0.098436] [<c0140204>] down_trylock+0x14/0x40 [ 0.098540] [<c027c7ea>] acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x3e/0xb9 [ 0.098647] [<c029263e>] acpi_ut_acquire_mutex+0x34/0x72 [ 0.098753] [<c0289ab1>] acpi_ns_root_initialize+0x19/0x250 [ 0.098859] [<c05453e6>] acpi_initialize_subsystem+0x42/0x64 [ 0.098966] [<c0545725>] acpi_early_init+0x50/0xef [ 0.099070] [<c052b7f6>] start_kernel+0x1e6/0x250 [ 0.099175] [<c052b1a0>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x130 [ 0.099310] [<c052b008>] __init_begin+0x8/0x10 [ 0.099414] ======================= From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (build failure) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:32:25 -0800 Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/ When SMP=n, x86_64 build gets: arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `acpi_save_state_mem': (.text+0xfd7f): undefined reference to `setup_trampoline' make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (x64 thermal build failure) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:16:03 -0800 Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/ ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n. linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c: In function 'acpi_thermal_init': linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c:1792: error: 'thermal_dmi_table' undeclared (first use in this function) linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c:1792: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c:1792: error: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [drivers/acpi/thermal.o] Error 1 _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
